[Financial AI Research] Recovered with 0 log errors? Save SHA of Oct 27 evening and not yet verified in production

If there are zero error strings, has the problem been resolved?

Conclusion: It cannot be said that the issue is recovered based on local search results alone.In the evening material with a deadline of Oct 27 18:35:47 JST, at 17:40:02 when reading the local EA log for that day, err=5004, GOLD13 REALTIME, and string matches for OrderSend or ticket= were each zero. However, what was loaded on the VPS, what was processed, and how orders or profits and losses turned out are unverified. This is not a result that confirms the cause of the error or a permanent resolution.

This article is about financial AI and AI agent R&D, and the study and verification of self-made indicators and EAs. The initial public release at 19:00 was the morning-cut material version. In the evening version, the data from the morning version for October 26 and the observations of October 27 evening are distinguished by time point. The original logs in full, the original trade details, independent re-audits of the VPS, and changes to trading environments have not been performed.

Basis: Saving objects and live confirmation differ

The sources are October 27 DAILY_BRIEF, code_changes, and excerpted evidence. The unit of 0 items is the number of string matches; SHA matches are based on saved files comparison. The 276 lines in the morning version are the total matches for October 26 logs, including periods outside the target. Because dates, ranges, and recording conditions differ, we do not calculate a ratio from 276 to 0.

Limitations and next checks: Even if the approach is inherited, it will not be approved for live changes

The policy of not trading on warning signals itself remains, while independently considering the normal signals that appear after a warning. Describing new AI discretionary methods or preserving documents does not count as new specifications approval, implementation, or deployment. Changes to the saved chart on Oct 20, the savers, and VPS reflections are also unconfirmed. A hash match in the evening does not explain the past changes.

Next, it is necessary to reference destinations and attributes, lock states, recurrence in the following day or later, and read the VPS actual version and input to confirm. This is not a proposal to fix code or MT4 settings while the cause is still uncertain. The approval, orders, and results of each candidate should be cross-checked with separate evidence, and we should not fill in profit/loss by guess. This is the evening update. The following is background from morning-cut materials with different time points, not the October 27 evening trading count.

Background: October 26 logs handled in the morning-cut material received at 12:26

If 88 lines of signals appear, did the EA trade 88 times?

The conclusion is that this cannot yet be said. In the handover received on Oct 27, there were 88 lines matching “GOLD13 REALTIME” in the local October 26 logs. However, this is the number of recorded lines. It has not been confirmed that this equals the number of unique trade candidates, AI-approved counts, orders placed by the EA, or filled trades. It does not equate to 88 trades, 88 successes, or 88 postponements.

This article reports on self-made indicator and EA research and verification as financial AI and AI agent R&D. It focuses readers' questions on whether “more signals means more performance,” and organizes what is missing between observation and order. It is a study involving real account testing, but it does not confirm that the 88 lines alone determine VPS live orders, positions, or profit/loss.

Evidence: What we could confirm this time is the aggregation of local logs described in the handover

The source material is LOCAL_CODEX_HANDOFF_2026-10-27_0610_JST. The planned target period is 2026-10-26 06:10～2026-10-27 06:10 JST, but the actual handover work began around 12:25 JST on Oct 27 and was saved to Drive at 12:26 JST. The name “06:10” does not prove that we obtained it at 06:10 or that live confirmation was performed at that time.

The file name of the local logs referenced in the material is 20261026.log, size 283,857 bytes, last updated 00:00:09 JST on Oct 27. The match for GOLD13 REALTIME is reported as 88 lines. What is confirmed is that this aggregation appears in the handover. It does not mean the editor re-counted the entire log independently and removed all duplicates.

The two illustrated lines are both bar=2026.10.26 01:00:00. Even with the same bar time, the direction, price, and warning state differ. This alone does not prove two trades occurred, nor can it confirm they are non-duplicate records. It is necessary to consider bar identification, recording time, event identifiers, and subsequent processing together. The price figures are log price values and not yen-denominated profit or loss.

Diagram: From line 88 to “actual trades” requires multiple verifications

The purpose of this diagram is not to make the numbers look smaller but to fix the meaning of the numbers. An increase in log entries can indicate more observation opportunities or more records. However, if we have not checked whether the same candidate was re-output, recorded as a warning, or awaiting subsequent approvals, using these as the denominator of performance would be misleading.

Do not count warnings as trades; treat post-warning normal signals independently

The current confirmed policy is not to trade on warning signals themselves, but to independently examine normal signals that appear after a warning. Therefore, having a row with warn=1 does not mean an order was placed due to a warning. Conversely, a single warning occurrence cannot be used to permanently exclude all subsequent normal candidates. The policy and actual handling are distinguished by the supporting records.

This distinction is also important when examining what the AI decided. If we prematurely decide that the reason a trade cannot be seen is that the AI properly avoided risk, we may miss issues such as communication delays, reference file problems, candidate expiration, or other control conditions. On the other hand, there is no evidence in this 88-line set that such problems actually occurred. We avoid leaps to success or failure, and keep the raw reasoning as the next verification target.

Limitation: time stamps and aggregation range are not aligned

The handover states that the time zone of log times and bar times are not reconciled. The file-name date and the JST target period are not necessarily the same framing. It is not possible to move the 88 lines to “October 27 trades” nor to strictly confirm them as “88 candidates occurred within October 26 JST target times.” This article maintains the unit of counted matches for October 26 local logs.

There are reports that the same log shows 0 lines for string matches of OrderSend and ticket= as well. However, this article has not audited whether that string design records all orders, writes to a separate log, or whether the log is complete. The absence of a string means that those search criteria did not find matches. It does not prove zero live trading or zero losses, and we do not publish profit/loss figures when currencies, executions, or fees are unverified.

Also, the observation that the SHA of the local EA, GOLD13, and saved chart was the same as the previous day is a comparison of saved files. It does not imply that the VPS version actually loaded, the effective settings, AutoTrading status, or order state were identical. It is a boundary of this report that the handover creation/saving/index updating is not presented as EA modification/deployment/live recovery completion.

Next checks: track the same single path for each candidate

In the next verification, first align the log times and target interval. Then confirm a unique signal ID or equivalent combination, and identify events with the same direction, price, warning category, and validity. If the same candidate is re-output, keep the line count and candidate count separately. We will not estimate duplicates by subtracting them from 88 in this iteration because this task is not complete.

Next, the candidate must be cross-checked in order: the EA accepted the candidate, the AI request sent, the corresponding response, handling of approvals, order requests, order tickets, and execution history. If one step is missing, leave that stage as unconfirmed. Even if one candidate can be tracked, it does not guarantee the quality of all 88 lines. In particular, do not derive a postponement reason by back-calculating from the absence of orders; it should be explained based on the time of judgment and the record at that time.

Finally, separate settled and held positions, and align the confirmed-profit period, currency, fees, and swap. These are future verification steps and not plans to place new orders for this article. The article does not operate EA, MT4, VPS, AutoTrading, or OBS; it does not perform live posting tests or real account order tests. If more supporting materials can be confirmed, we will broaden the scope of the claims.

In the morning version, verification with the evening supplementary materials was left incomplete. That result is added at the top of this article. However, the distinction between local observations and direct VPS confirmation, and the cross-check from individual candidates to orders and settlements, remains incomplete.

The research process is also covered in a weekday 24-hour trade-live streaming. However, streaming itself does not guarantee complete cross-check of 88 lines. There is no confirmed recording showing the same 88-line trades; therefore, we do not embed videos from other days or trades as evidence. If supporting material is confirmed, we will selectively showcase it with GoGoJungle video features.

A sales page for the self-made indicators and EA research and verification isGogoJungle product pageHere, observations do not guarantee any market direction or profit. Please check the current display on the sales page for purchase availability and conditions. The conclusion of this article is “do not read 88 lines as trading results.” The next check is to connect the same candidate from order to settlement by time and identifier.