10/19/2026 07:51

Release： 10/19/2026 07:51

Update： 10/19/2026 07:51

We are validating FX trading methods, including transaction costs. We have tested about 2,100 variations—indicators, price action, popular strategies from TradingView and MQL5, time periods and calendar quirks—on data spanning 12 years with domestic broker costs. Only one method passed all the tests. In the validation, we adhere to: - Decide and preserve the rules and passing criteria before reviewing the results - Separate the period for finding strategies from the period for verification - Always include costs such as spreads and swaps - Suspect random luck and double-check calculations Tools and records created during this process are offered as products: - Line Lot Order Panel (MT5): By simply drawing an SL line, it calculates the position size as a percentage of the account to match the loss and places the order - Account Guard Daily Loss Limiter (MT5): If daily loss reaches the limit, cancel reservations and close all positions - Verification Records eBook: The real reasons why profitability is elusive and 10 trends and countermeasures I would be glad if this helps those who want to verify the difference between “seems promising” and “can truly win” with numbers. ※Past verification results do not guarantee future profits. Please make investment decisions on your own.

Series

FX verification notes | 2,100 variations of records and production backstory · market wisdom

I will deliver daily columns that share the records of testing around 2,100 FX methods using AI and what can be seen from those results. 【What this is about】・FX topics: When costs are included and tested, what happens to popular methods. How to read performance tables. How to spot AI calculation errors. ・Behind the scenes: Real events of creating MT5 tools and prototype EAs (I will also write about things that didn’t go well). ・Market insights: From the verification data, the approach to continuing. ・A section that introduces others' publications and juxtaposes them with my verification data. 【Writing commitments】・I will cite sources, timeframes, and counts for numbers. ・I will write about not only successful cases but also failures and things I don’t understand. ・I will not promise future profits or advocate specific trades. 【Updates】 I plan to update almost daily (some days off). ※This series is a record of verification and information provision. Please make your own investment decisions.

Add to cart

$6.21/month

Reference price (JPY): ￥980/月 (taxed)

Monthly subscriptions are only available on the Japanese site.

Even with the same pin bar, the win rate changed this much depending on the take-profit range

The winning ratio was not determined by the shape of the chart alone. By simply changing the width of profit-taking, the win rate for the same signal varied greatly.

This time, from the pin bar study at hand, we will take up a comparison that changes only the exit for the same signal. We will place the win rate and the net profit after costs in a single chart.