“Protect before increasing profits”

Profit is possible.

The entry is not bad.

The read is also correct.

Even so—

for some reason, funds do not increase.

The reason is simple.

Because there is no exit defined.

Many people,

put all their effort into where to enter.

However,

preserving capital is not an “entry.”

It is an “exit.”

For example, like this.

Unrealized profit rises by 20 pips.

But,

you think, “It might rise a little more.”

As a result,

you return to the entry price.

Or it becomes negative.

This is not a lack of ability.

The exit is just unclear.

Conversely, consider this:

From the start

・Today ends at 20 pips

・On days targeting 100 pips, only under these conditions

・No trading after a certain hour

What would happen if you had set this?

Hesitation decreases.

Emotions become less volatile.

And above all,

the “eroded” part disappears.

Stability is not about increasing win rate.

It is about not being eroded.

Rather than expanding profits,

it is about preserving profits.

When this reverses,

trading changes dramatically in an instant.

The moment you define the exit,

reproducibility arises.

When reproducibility arises,

fear decreases.

When fear decreases,

it stops collapsing.

Having read this far,

if you think, “I was collapsing at the exit,”

then what you need is not grit.

A mechanism that does not require you to decide with your emotions.

A logic that judges by closing price.

A structure to prevent collapse.

I have turned that into a single form.

That is

Issen FS Mamori (Aegis).